Search Results for 'Top'

Home Forums Search Search Results for 'Top'

Viewing 15 results - 751 through 765 (of 2,834 total)
  • Author
    Search Results
  • JUSA
    Member
    • Topics: 6
    • Replies: 107
    • Total: 113
    • ★★★★

    I mentioned the water in game…

    Basically there was a 3 high area-3 blocks long, 1 block wide filled with water. 1 wall had slabs on the top, so if I hovered at the right height, I could shoot through it with a bow. I was holding space bar to swim up so i could shoot through the hole and after releasing space bar and tapping it a few times to hover at the right height to shoot through the slab i was kicked for flying. Guessing the gittering motion of going up and down repeatedly caused it to think I was flying maybe?

     

    I can setup a wall in game to demonstrate if my description was unclear.

    Death to da Brits
    Death to da Elves
    Death to da Fruits

    Heck..Death to Everyone 😀

    Lawzoneon
    Moderator
    • Topics: 14
    • Replies: 242
    • Total: 256
    • ★★★★★

    Oh galaxy was faster than me,

    but here is a short Video of the bow spam bug,  just in case it’s still needed: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G_Au8ugOvpM&feature=youtu.be

    the first Minute it was all fine, but once it starts it gets really annoying and even stops you from Shooting arrows for 5 seconds

    #50896

    In reply to: Ban Appeal

    mountainrasta
    Moderator
    • Topics: 4
    • Replies: 104
    • Total: 108
    • ★★★★

    First you came on and said you did’nt want to  play on this server anymore, so why didnt you just leave. But instead of taking a break until you wanted to play here again you started spaming chat with swear words, bypassing the filter and spaming AFK on and off.  I asked you to stop, I even kicked you twice and still you came back on and done it again and again. Tell me please why this time it would be any different?  and I might give you another chance.

    #50889

    In reply to: Good spot

    GodsDead
    Keymaster
    • Topics: 794
    • Replies: 3344
    • Total: 4138
    • ★★★★★★★★

    There is a specific forum to post these in: https://piratemc.com/topic/requests-to-remove-claims/ ? @waterpool

    Actually he posted in the right place! Its a brand new forum https://piratemc.com/forums/server-support/claims/ made for just that! means we can close them when there done!


    @WaterPool
    Removed.

    #50886

    In reply to: Good spot

    Xeron
    Blocked
    • Topics: 94
    • Replies: 650
    • Total: 744
    • ★★★★★★

    There is a specific forum to post these in: https://piratemc.com/topic/requests-to-remove-claims/

    😉


    @WaterPool

    « Build Team leader »
    « Server Admin »
    Crew History: Red Lotus, 0utlaws, Ottoman Empire, Xenon Empire, The Xanthian Order, The Asylum, Xenia
    @Xeron

    Galaxy
    Member
    • Topics: 25
    • Replies: 160
    • Total: 185
    • ★★★★

    Ye you just stand on a block and mine down.

    Also the custom swords are very weird, I was testing at warp shops and it let me do it on slabs but not on stonebrick. I don’t know what other blocks it does/doesn’t work on.

    Also the bow spam thing doesn’t seem to much like a problem. I couldn’t even notice it but it stops you from shooting like 1 arrow out of every 20 you spam.

    Ic3y ;]
    Blocked
    • Topics: 36
    • Replies: 123
    • Total: 159
    • ★★★★

    If /near and /craft were for non-donater ranks, this would ruin the donator rank business model because it renders the donator ranks  lieutenant and commander (execption of /top and the 4 homes) worthless. This is because, hypitheticaly, quartermaster could have 3 homes (like lieutenant), /near (like lieutenant) , and /craft (like lieutenant – in this senario.

     

    Although a nice suggestion ,there would be have to be more donator only perks for this to work.

    unban?

    #50858
    PaulOnFire
    Member
    • Topics: 133
    • Replies: 1221
    • Total: 1354
    • ★★★★★★★

    Just realised this topic missed the chance of using a great pop culture title!

    Guess we’re all pining for a more realistic PirateCraft world.

    #50824
    Viper
    Member
    • Topics: 12
    • Replies: 110
    • Total: 122
    • ★★★★

    [bug] Statistics issues !! MUST READ !!

    Post it here.

    Captain of the Pirate Crew Black Clover

    See ya maties either behind my cannons or in their line of fire

    #50758
    Iridus
    Member
    • Topics: 11
    • Replies: 78
    • Total: 89
    • ★★★

    Hey, sad to hear about your problem. Thanksfully, it is a well known issue and you should use thia thread: https://piratemc.com/topic/bug-statistics-issues-must-read/ .

    All the best!

    PaulOnFire
    Member
    • Topics: 133
    • Replies: 1221
    • Total: 1354
    • ★★★★★★★

    Greetings, sea dogs and rapscallions!

    Today the British people have voted in favour of an amendment to our charter. It concerns the British Empire’s PvP regulation and is thus important for every crew to see.

    Article IV – Raiding and War

    Citizens of the Empire may engage any player whose crew has not signed a Non-Aggression Pact (NAP) or other non-aggression treaty with the British Empire. Crews which have signed such treaties with the BE are considered allies and may not be targeted for player versus player combat (PvP) without their consent unless in defence. Likewise, no citizen may engage another member of the Empire without their consent unless in defence. Individual players and groups of players who act physically aggressively, regardless of nationality, may be immediately targeted for retribution.

    Put simply: If your crew doesn’t have a non-aggression pact with the British Empire (BE), our folks will be allowed to fight you.

    BE therefore cordially invites all her allies to sign a binding non-aggression treaty which can be found HERE. If you are not friends with us, but would like to avoid any future conflicts, we ask of you to do the same.

    Undoubtedly, many of you will be asking yourselves: Why has BE decided to implement such a change? For this reason we have prepared a short Q&A session which should hopefully put your thoughts to rest. Please feel free to pose any questions you may have in this very thread.

    Q1) Why is BE changing its charter?

    Over the years our crew has grown experienced in the ways of Piratecraft. We have fought in many wars and we have accomplished many feats. We have also enjoyed a very large population of crew members in our time. BE generally maintains good relationships with those who have left for greener pastures – even months after their departure. What interests us is the reason why some people decide to leave in the first place. The answer, coming from the majority, is that they are unable to pursue their PvP interests. While BE does not support the raiding of innocent, peaceful players, we do recognise that duelling and raiding is a valid reason to play on the server. To a certain degree we are willing to accommodate that.

    The second reason is to render defence somewhat less complicated. Up until now our charter has not permitted us to retaliate until first blood has been shed. Now citizens of the Empire may act preemptively against presumed hostiles. We will maintain lists of crews who we are friendly with on various channels. This is less time consuming than keeping individual kill on sight recordings up to date.

    Q2) Is BE now a pirate crew?

    No. Since her founding in early 2015, BE has always sought to pursue neutral to friendly relations with all non-hostile crews. This treaty does not change our core values. What it changes is our definition of a “non-hostile” crew. In our reckoning, any crew who wishes to be friendly with BE should be willing to sign a non-aggression treaty with us. Any crew who refuses is basically saying that they would attack us if they got the chance.

    Q3) What happens if an allied crew member breaks the treaty?

    Same thing as what happens with any treaty. If the ally is serious, there will be appropriate consequences. If not, there is no reason why BE should sign any future non-aggression treaty with them.

    Q4) Will I now be attacked by BE PvPers?

    Not if you sign a simple Non-Aggression Pact with us. If you’re a one-man (or lady) crew, we’ll even consider making a personal treaty with you. Also, we discourage our citizens from raiding players with a peaceful reputation. If you do not belong to this group, there is the possibility that you will be raided.

    PaulOnFire
    Member
    • Topics: 133
    • Replies: 1221
    • Total: 1354
    • ★★★★★★★

    Greetings, sea dogs of Piratecraft.

    Today the British people have voted in favour of an amendment to our charter. It concerns the British Empire’s PvP regulation and is thus important for every crew to see.

    Article IV – Raiding and War

    Citizens of the Empire may engage any player whose crew has not signed a Non-Aggression Pact (NAP) or other non-aggression treaty with the British Empire. Crews which have signed such treaties with the BE are considered allies and may not be targeted for player versus player combat (PvP) without their consent unless in defence. Likewise, no citizen may engage another member of the Empire without their consent unless in defence. Individual players and groups of players who act physically aggressively, regardless of nationality, may be immediately targeted for retribution.

    Put simply: If your crew doesn’t have a non-aggression pact with the British Empire (BE), our folks will be allowed to fight you.

    BE therefore cordially invites all her allies to sign a binding non-aggression treaty which can be found HERE. If you are not friends with us, but would like to avoid any future conflicts, we ask of you to do the same.

    Undoubtedly, many of you will be asking yourselves: Why has BE decided to implement such a change? For this reason we have prepared a short Q&A session which should hopefully put your thoughts to rest. Please feel free to pose any questions you may have in this very thread.

    Q1) Why is BE changing its charter?

    Over the years our crew has grown experienced in the ways of Piratecraft. We have fought in many wars and we have accomplished many feats. We have also enjoyed a very large population of crew members in our time. BE generally maintains good relationships with those who have left for greener pastures – even months after their departure. What interests us is the reason why some people decide to leave in the first place. The answer, coming from the majority, is that they are unable to pursue their PvP interests. While BE does not support the raiding of innocent, peaceful players, we do recognise that duelling and raiding is a valid reason to play on the server. To a certain degree we are willing to accommodate that.

    The second reason is to render defence somewhat less complicated. Up until now our charter has not permitted us to retaliate until first blood has been shed. Now citizens of the Empire may act preemptively against presumed hostiles. We will maintain lists of crews who we are friendly with on various channels. This is less time consuming than keeping individual kill on sight recordings up to date.

    Q2) Is BE now a pirate crew?

    No. Since her founding in early 2015, BE has always sought to pursue neutral to friendly relations with all non-hostile crews. This treaty does not change our core values. What it changes is our definition of a “non-hostile” crew. In our reckoning, any crew who wishes to be friendly with BE should be willing to sign a non-aggression treaty with us. Any crew who refuses is basically saying that they would attack us if they got the chance.

    Q3) What happens if an allied crew member breaks the treaty?

    Same thing as what happens with any treaty. If the ally is serious, there will be appropriate consequences. If not, there is no reason why BE should sign any future non-aggression treaty with them.

    Q4) Will I now be attacked by BE PvPers?

    Not if you sign a simple Non-Aggression Pact with us. If you’re a one-man (or lady) crew, we’ll even consider making a personal treaty with you. Also, we discourage our citizens from raiding players with a peaceful reputation. If you do not belong to this group, there is the possibility that you will be raided.

    PaulOnFire
    Member
    • Topics: 133
    • Replies: 1221
    • Total: 1354
    • ★★★★★★★

    Greetings, everybody.

    Today the British people have voted in favour of an amendment to our charter. It concerns the British Empire’s PvP regulation and is thus important for every crew to see.

    Article IV – Raiding and War

    Citizens of the Empire may engage any player whose crew has not signed a Non-Aggression Pact (NAP) or other non-aggression treaty with the British Empire. Crews which have signed such treaties with the BE are considered allies and may not be targeted for player versus player combat (PvP) without their consent unless in defence. Likewise, no citizen may engage another member of the Empire without their consent unless in defence. Individual players and groups of players who act physically aggressively, regardless of nationality, may be immediately targeted for retribution.

    Put simply: If your crew doesn’t have a non-aggression pact with the British Empire (BE), our folks will be allowed to fight you.

    BE therefore cordially invites all her allies to sign a binding non-aggression treaty which can be found HERE. If you are not friends with us, but would like to avoid any future conflicts, we ask of you to do the same.

    Undoubtedly, many of you will be asking yourselves: Why has BE decided to implement such a change? For this reason we have prepared a short Q&A session which should hopefully put your thoughts to rest. Please feel free to pose any questions you may have in this very thread.

    Q1) Why is BE changing its charter?

    Over the years our crew has grown experienced in the ways of Piratecraft. We have fought in many wars and we have accomplished many feats. We have also enjoyed a very large population of crew members in our time. BE generally maintains good relationships with those who have left for greener pastures – even months after their departure. What interests us is the reason why some people decide to leave in the first place. The answer, coming from the majority, is that they are unable to pursue their PvP interests. While BE does not support the raiding of innocent, peaceful players, we do recognise that duelling and raiding is a valid reason to play on the server. To a certain degree we are willing to accommodate that.

    The second reason is to render defence somewhat less complicated. Up until now our charter has not permitted us to retaliate until first blood has been shed. Now citizens of the Empire may act preemptively against presumed hostiles. We will maintain lists of crews who we are friendly with on various channels. This is less time consuming than keeping individual kill on sight recordings up to date.

    Q2) Is BE now a pirate crew?

    No. Since her founding in early 2015, BE has always sought to pursue neutral to friendly relations with all non-hostile crews. This treaty does not change our core values. What it changes is our definition of a “non-hostile” crew. In our reckoning, any crew who wishes to be friendly with BE should be willing to sign a non-aggression treaty with us. Any crew who refuses is basically saying that they would attack us if they got the chance.

    Q3) What happens if an allied crew member breaks the treaty?

    Same thing as what happens with any treaty. If the ally is serious, there will be appropriate consequences. If not, there is no reason why BE should sign any future non-aggression treaty with them.

    Q4) Will I now be attacked by BE PvPers?

    Not if you sign a simple Non-Aggression Pact with us. If you’re a one-man (or lady) crew, we’ll even consider making a personal treaty with you. Also, we discourage our citizens from raiding players with a peaceful reputation. If you do not belong to this group, there is the possibility that you will be raided.

    #50724
    PaulOnFire
    Member
    • Topics: 133
    • Replies: 1221
    • Total: 1354
    • ★★★★★★★

    Any crews interested in maintaining peaceful relations with the British Empire are cordially invited to request a Non-Aggression Pact (NAP) in this thread.

    Below is an example for a simple NAP. It may be adjusted to accommodate the needs of the individual agreement.

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    BE Non-Aggression Pact Template

    Preamble

    Acknowledging their respective sovereignty, [CREW] and the British Empire hereby enter this Non-Aggression Pact in recognition of their common interests.

    Article I: Non-Aggression

    Both [CREW] and the British Empire agree to refrain of any kind of hostile activity towards each other. Any breach of this agreement will be dealt with in a timely and efficient manner.

    Article II: Cancellation

    The pact may be cancelled by either signatory with a three day advance notice. Should one or both crews cease to exist, the treaty shall be rendered defunct.

    Signatures:

    _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    HOW TO APPLY:

    Fill out the request form below and post it in this topic or send it in a PM to the current Foreign Secretary [Bislo1], so that we may start processing the application

    The BE voting process will start no longer than 12 hours after submission of a request. additionally 12 hours of voting will be added and once the result is clear, the official who has requested a NAP will be contacted privately.

    The pact itself will be publicly displayed on the BE wiki page.

    REQUEST FORM

    _________________________________

    Crew:

     

    Leader:

     

    Additional high officials(if any):

     

    Current member count:

     

    Allies:

     

    Rivals:

     

    #50610

    In reply to: unban request

    Charlie
    Member
    • Topics: 63
    • Replies: 437
    • Total: 500
    • ★★★★★★

    ApuOblikas

    1. There is no need to create multiple threads about the same thing.
    2. You were found by a player mining in an obvious x-ray tunnel
    3. When I said ‘you have 10 seconds to respond’, all you needed to do was message me back… Not take a screenshot.
    4. There is absolutely no way I can check the time that screenshot was taken. If you had used F2 to take a screenshot, you would have made your life so much easier.
    5. You joined the server moments after I had banned you with an alt instead of doing the right think and coming to the forums to appeal, which not only shows disrespect, but it also not allowed on this server.
    6. You have been trying to join the server all day to no avail, as if you’re owed a position on this server…

    Unless other staff members disagree, you will be staying banned.

Viewing 15 results - 751 through 765 (of 2,834 total)

/50 Online

Mobile Page

Join the PirateCraft discord server
Join the PirateCraft Discord server! discord.piratemc.com
Reddit - PirateCraft Subreddit PirateCraft YouTube PirateCraft Twitter PirateCraft Instagram PirateCraft Facebook