Reply To: Bigger Submarine.
Home › Forums › Server Support › Requests & Suggestions › Bigger Submarine. › Reply To: Bigger Submarine.
Right first of all, it cannot be 2000 something blocks, as that’d be stupidly big for a submarine- it’d be bigger than a Manowar.
However I would argue in favor of a bigger submarine, however in the vicinity of 1000-1500.
I would also not have boatswain as the rank you could use it at, as submarines as it already is are incredibly flexibly great craft, but I’d argue it to be an insult for it to be accessed at such a low level (I could also say this about how the Seawolf is accessed also at sailor as well as its smaller variant Barracuda) we can also argue that with the relatively small amount of use of ships current, let alone submarines, that a larger size would be used more in the staged ship battles rather than recreationally, as I can argue I’ve seen large submarines built by senna_j_dub and his friend (who’s name i’ve forgotten), which have not needed +1000 blocks.
I would instead argue for it to be a firstmate or even quartermaster rank, so it properly is complimented by such a high rank to master such a large submarine, as I’m sure the Soviet Navy (or any navy) wouldn’t want a boatswain commanding a ship the size of the Nuclear Powered Ballistic Missile Soviet Submarine Typhoon class (which would never be allowed on the server, as its stupid big), the Seawolf class being the largest Nuclear Powered Attack Submarines fielded in the world anyway, which again, encourages it to be a higher rank than boatswain.
Names we could have from (in order of smallest to largest after Seawolf;
-Vanguard (British Nuke.Pow.Bal.Mis)
-Borei (Russia Nuke.Pow.Bal.Mis)
-Ohio (US Nuke.Pow.Bal.Mis)
-Typhoon (USSR(/Descain) Nuke.Pow.Bal.Mis)
Anyway I hope you get my point.
Its not necessary, but making it boatswain isn’t right, as a side note the seawolf class should probably be bumped a couple of ranks also.
/50 Online
Vote
Get daily vote key rewards for voting! Use your keys at /warp cove